Scrolls of Lore Forums  

Go Back   Scrolls of Lore Forums > Scrolls of Lore > Halls of Lordaeron

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #55526  
Old Yesterday, 11:30 AM
PajamaSalad PajamaSalad is offline

Elune
PajamaSalad's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Undisclosed location in the Universe.
Posts: 41,566

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reinhardt View Post
http://www.nj.com/burlington/index.s...a_meeting.html

Fellow airmen and women, don't be late to meetings because of your duty it will end up badly for you.
According to this:

http://www.afjag.af.mil/LinkClick.as...3D&portalid=77

he was only sentenced to a reprimand for being late.

Being demoted, which was separate, can get you kicked out because there is only a certain amount of time you can be a specific rank before you are forced to leave. If you simply don't make promotion too many years in a row you will be removed from service . That time limit applies when you get demoted.

There is probably a paper trail somewhere that isn't being mentioned. We may never know until we get more sides of the story.
Reply With Quote
  #55527  
Old Yesterday, 11:41 AM
Kakwakas Kakwakas is offline

Elune
Kakwakas's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: US
Posts: 7,077

Darkmoon Card: Elementals

Quote:
Originally Posted by PajamaSalad View Post
There is probably a paper trail somewhere that isn't being mentioned. We may never know until we get more sides of the story.
They mention a papertrail in the first article, but the guy claims he only ever got paperwork after trying to complain about things that are never explained.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #55528  
Old Yesterday, 04:24 PM
PajamaSalad PajamaSalad is offline

Elune
PajamaSalad's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Undisclosed location in the Universe.
Posts: 41,566

Default

Apparently the Democrats tried to copy Papa Johns when it came to inventing their new slogan:

A Better Deal: Better Skills, Better Jobs, Better Wages

I do wonder how they intend to accomplish that?

Are they going to help reform our public schools? They have signaled intention to bail out the $1 trillion in student debt but many of those people with those skills are unable to find good jobs while many trade skilled jobs go unfilled. Not everyone can just work for the government or one of its beneficiaries. What is their plan to make jobs for everyone else? Not everyone works minimum wage and even then raising it eliminates a path for many to earn skills and makes everything more expensive for everyone else.

Maybe they should just stick to the Russia story or social issues? Unless they want to argue that the DoD wasn't starving for resources or that people like General Mattis are not qualified to make military decisions. I am not sure many voters that consider national security a top issue will be on board with that.
Reply With Quote
  #55529  
Old Today, 12:59 AM
C9H20 C9H20 is offline

Elune
C9H20's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 11,739

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PajamaSalad View Post
Unless they want to argue that the DoD wasn't starving for resources
Sorry not being combative here but that statement is beyond ridiculous. If there is one thing on this world that is not starving it'd be your DoD. If NASA had its budget we would already have a ship heading to Alpha Centauri and a human presence in every corner of the Solar system. The size of the US defense budget is literally that crazy.

EDIT: Just saw this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruinshin View Post
Yeah this is something straight out of a dystopia where the well off want the poor to stop existing. Sucks to see the bad future is still on tracks.

Last edited by C9H20; Today at 01:07 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #55530  
Old Today, 03:27 AM
Ragnahar Ragnahar is offline

Poor Soldier
Ragnahar's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 12,357
BattleTag: Mathias#1221

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C9H20 View Post
Yeah this is something straight out of a dystopia where the well off want the poor to stop existing. Sucks to see the bad future is still on tracks.
I think you guys are forgetting the fact it's a choice. A choice given to people that benefits society.
__________________
Game over, man. Game over.
Reply With Quote
  #55531  
Old Today, 04:55 AM
C9H20 C9H20 is offline

Elune
C9H20's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 11,739

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ragnahar View Post
I think you guys are forgetting the fact it's a choice. A choice given to people that benefits society.
It still sets a chilling precedent. And at least give those guys 6-12 months off for what amounts to emasculation as punishment.
Reply With Quote
  #55532  
Old Today, 06:40 AM
Ragnahar Ragnahar is offline

Poor Soldier
Ragnahar's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 12,357
BattleTag: Mathias#1221

Default

Is it a punishment if you get too choose to do it and gain the reward of early freedom? Negative.
__________________
Game over, man. Game over.
Reply With Quote
  #55533  
Old Today, 09:47 AM
PajamaSalad PajamaSalad is offline

Elune
PajamaSalad's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Undisclosed location in the Universe.
Posts: 41,566

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C9H20 View Post
Sorry not being combative here but that statement is beyond ridiculous. If there is one thing on this world that is not starving it'd be your DoD. If NASA had its budget we would already have a ship heading to Alpha Centauri and a human presence in every corner of the Solar system. The size of the US defense budget is literally that crazy.
The US spends more on everything due to the scope of its economy. We have a bigger GDP than the EU despite having less people. I meant more in the way of issues with under manning and equipment/training shortfalls because no politician is going to cut back on the mission. Obama and Clinton certainly didn't. A Facebook meme doesn't accurately portray people that are over stressed because of back to back deployments or having to work 60-80 hours a week on a meager salary. Most Americans are opposed to subjecting people to that.

The DoD is heavily tied to NASA. Most of our astronauts have a military background and the DoD can lend out service members as astronauts. The USAF itself has its own space command and space is supposed to be one of its domains. The investment in things like rockets and space communications are shared research areas. A lot of the Aerospace Engineers here at Purdue are going to end up in the defense industry to hone their skills but those skills are directly applicable to NASA's mission. They both compliment each other.

There are some pretty big technological and logistical hurdles for NASA to go out further into space. A manned mission to Mars would take almost two years. Our economy still needs to be strong in the way it has been that allowed us to pay for the Apollo Mission in the first place. We can't have a more tepid economy that produces less because it is more concerned about equal outcomes and a centralized body helping determining who gets to be rich. Our society needs to focus on things that actually help with space exploration in the STEM fields. Defense doesn't have to be sacrificed in order to accomplish any of that when our government wastes so much money on non-essential purposes or hurts our economy with a convoluted and uneven tax system and sub-optimal regulatory burden. Some people would just rather have a weaker economy and a stronger government to control that economy than a stronger economy and a weaker government with less control.
Reply With Quote
  #55534  
Old Today, 11:01 AM
Reinhardt Reinhardt is offline

Sentinel Queen
Reinhardt's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 877

Default

The DoD not spending it wisely doesn't mean they don't have a lot of money.
Reply With Quote
  #55535  
Old Today, 11:16 AM
PajamaSalad PajamaSalad is offline

Elune
PajamaSalad's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Undisclosed location in the Universe.
Posts: 41,566

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reinhardt View Post
The DoD not spending it wisely doesn't mean they don't have a lot of money.
All government agencies has a certain degree of waste, including NASA. I rather cut back on non-essential government functions and their assorted waste so it becomes easier to manage the DoD and some of its budget issues. The government is just too massive to control. Despite the cries of DoD waste neither Clinton or Obama decided to go after that waste during their budget draw downs. Instead it went towards readiness and things that directly impact the troops. It really makes you question whether or not the waste is as big as they suggest it is or it is just a guilt free way to spend the money on priorities that help their political ambitions more without accepting the reality of the decision.

A lot of even wealthy European nations can't carry out any sort of operation without the help of the US. They lack critical mission functions like ISR and air-to-air refueling. I think there is a great ignorance among the civilians of those countries regarding the shape of their defense departments. Instead of understanding what defense does or how it spends money they will simply always believe it needs less, especially when believing that means they can spend it on other things. I think defense is a critical function of the government. It is non-excludable and non-rivalrous. Politically the cost it takes to support a service member in Afghanistan may win you a few votes but it isn't as much votes as you can get if you spent that money closer to home on government made jobs or special favors. I think it is a cultural failure when people see government spending as a source of their livelihood and thus other sources of funding are competitors. People should see the economy as expandable and want to create their own wealth instead of fighting over a dwindling pie. When they do the essential functions of government and the private sector suffers when the government shifts that money to support their political ambitions.
Reply With Quote
  #55536  
Old Today, 11:47 AM
Kakwakas Kakwakas is offline

Elune
Kakwakas's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: US
Posts: 7,077

Default

I don't know how to explain to you why eugenics programs encouraging the sterilisation of "undesirables" is a bad idea.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #55537  
Old Today, 05:17 PM
Ruinshin Ruinshin is offline

Elune
Ruinshin's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 20,444

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kakwakas View Post
I don't know how to explain to you why eugenics programs encouraging the sterilisation of "undesirables" is a bad idea.
Ehh. It's not sterilization. Again, it's a fairly easy process to reverse, it just costs money. I don't like it, but address it as it is.
__________________
“Born to be a king, I ask one thing in return: a front seat to watch Earth burn."
Reply With Quote
  #55538  
Old Today, 05:34 PM
Kakwakas Kakwakas is offline

Elune
Kakwakas's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: US
Posts: 7,077

Darkmoon Card: Elementals

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruinshin View Post
Ehh. It's not sterilization. Again, it's a fairly easy process to reverse, it just costs money. I don't like it, but address it as it is.
Vasectomies are generally considered permanent. If you get it reversed within something like 3 years (for like $10,000), you have about a 50% chance of a successful reversal. The odds get worse from there.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
politics, serious business, sylvanas for president

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.