View Single Post
  #40  
Old 12-30-2013, 12:28 AM
Fojar Fojar is offline

Elune
Fojar's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Toronto, Lordaeron
Posts: 17,442

Default

Except the Horde is not a rational actor. It is an irrational actor that does whatever it wants until something stops it.

Furthermore considering the destructiveness the Horde has displayed over the past decade at what point does it become clear that the Alliance should pursue total victory because the Horde cannot be trusted to maintain its own affairs? Was it when they declared unprovoked war and began seizing Alliance territory? Was it when they deployed horrific bio-weapons on Alliance towns and began continuing the work of the Scourge? Was it when they used a WMD on an Alliance capital and killed every man, woman, and child in the city instantaneously?

What precisely does the Horde need to do for the Alliance to say "Yes, the cost of total victory and unconditional Horde surrender is worth the cost today because of what it will save tomorrow?"
__________________
"Noble countrymen, evil is upon us. Darkness has befallen our shores. Rise and slay thy enemies� strike, strike so others shall live. The meek shall not fade into the night� live my brethren, live." - King Terenas Menethil II
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaronGrackle View Post
You are right Fojar.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pajamasalad View Post
You are right Fojar.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbraid View Post
You are right Fojar.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triceron View Post
You are right Fojar.
Reply With Quote